What role does artificial intelligence (AI) play in this process?
van Lengen: An AI can help at many points during production. For example, it can help to rule out an active ingredient candidate as useless from the outset or it can monitor and improve the production of a plant. The quality assurance of our plant and the process control, i.e. the control of pumps, mixers etc., are mapped completely digitally – via a digital twin and also with the help of AI-supported software tools.
The AI supports us by reporting, for example, that a parameter is not set optimally. At least that is the plan for the end of the project. However, we are currently still working on the system and testing whether it does what it is supposed to do, namely package mRNA. For cost reasons, we are currently testing with substituents. Towards the end of the project, we will test with a vaccine candidate against the West Nile virus, as a project partner has a patent on it. We have an mRNA that is coded for this virus. We are looking to see if our plant can package it correctly and make it effective.
What software do you use for production monitoring?
van Lengen: We use various software tools. The COPE process control software from the Fraunhofer IPT, which controls the individual components. This means, for example, that the software gives a pump the command to move in a certain direction in order to dispense liquid. We also use the Industry 4.0 middleware Eclipse BaSyx from Fraunhofer IESE, which was actually developed for Industry 4.0 to control production processes and quality control.
We combine all of this to be able to produce quickly and in a targeted manner with the screening system. We can digitally model risk management, i.e. represent it as an abstract model. Our colleagues in the department have developed algorithms based on this abstract model that automatically generate digital twins for quality control. This has the advantage of being able to track changes to regulations at lightning speed.
In these cases, it is built into the model, a new twin is generated and the information is transferred, allowing you to react very flexibly. This also applies to individual parts, for example if a pump needs to be replaced. If the installed model is no longer available, for example, I can easily use a different manufacturer. The only challenge is that every change to the system must be recertified. This is because it produces medicines that are to be taken by people. Special regulations apply here, as the quality must be consistently high. We are currently looking for digital methods of certification to be able to certify faster than has been possible to date. Otherwise, you would immediately lose the advantage you have gained by quickly replacing a component. This aspect will be the subject of further research over the next one to two years.
When is the project due to be completed?
van Lengen: By the end of 2025, the system should be completed at the Fraunhofer IMM in Mainz and also made available to industrial partners.
Looking very far into the future: When do you think patients will benefit from the new procedure?
van Lengen: Good question, I can only speculate. We are thinking about designing, developing, certifying and setting up such systems in cooperation with other institutes. Production could then be set up at a university hospital, for example. But realistically, it will probably take around five to ten years to get to that point.